Legal Opinion
Joyce v. Ford Motor Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 6, 2011No. C064453PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOCH, J.
Daniel Joyce sued Ford Motor Company (Ford) for violation of the refund-or-replace provision of the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (Civ. Code, §§ 1790, 1793.2, subd. (d)(2); the Act), arising out of Joyce’s purchase of a new 2005 Ford F-250 truck.1 Ford moved for nonsuit at the close of Joyce’s case-in-chief arguing that the truck fell outside the Act’s protection because it was bought or used primarily for business purposes and had a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,000 pounds. Following a jury verdict in Joyce’s favor, the trial court granted the motion and entered…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People ex rel. Lungren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. TannerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Elsner v. UvegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Kaufman & Broad Communities, Inc. v. Performance Plastering, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lafferty v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- UFCW & Employers Benefit Trust v. Sutter Health CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Chino MHC v. City of ChinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Leber v. DKD of Davis, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Kirzhner v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.