Legal Opinion

Kirzhner v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided November 27, 2017No. G052551PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

*455This case under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act ( Civ. Code, § 1790 et seq., Act), concerned an allegedly defective car which could not be repaired after multiple attempts. Plaintiff Allen Kirzhner accepted an offer of compromise pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 998 (998 offer) from defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, including a restitution provision identical to Civil Code section 1793.2, subdivision (d)(2)(B) ( section 1793.2(b)(2)(B) ; all further statutory references are to the Civil Code).

The court awarded plaintiff over $47,000 in accordance with the 998 offer.

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cummins, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Mitchell v. Blue Bird Body Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Joyce v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kirzhner v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API