Legal Opinion

Locke v. Karass

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 21, 2009No. 07-610PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breyer

The State of Maine requires government employees to pay a service fee to the local union that acts as their exclusive bargaining agent even if those employees disagree with, and *210do not belong to, the union. This Court has held that, in principle, the government may require this kind of payment without violating the First Amendment. See, e. g., Railway Employes v. Hanson, 351 U. S. 225 (1956) (upholding such an arrangement as constitutional); Abood v. Detroit Bd. of Ed., 431 U. S. 209 (1977) (same); Lehnert v. Ferris Faculty Assn., 500 U. S. 507 (1991) (same). At the same time, the Court has…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. International Ass'n of MacHinists v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Ellis v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station EmployesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Railway Employes' Department v. HansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employes v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Janus v. State, County, and Municipal EmployeesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. Harris v. QuinnSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Mark Janus v. American Federation of StateCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  4. Hernandez v. Afscme Cal.District Court, E.D. California · 2019
  5. Seidemann v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API