Legal Opinion

Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employes v. Allen

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 13, 1963No. 316PublishedCited by 219 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

By the terms of an agreement (the Agreement) authorized by § 2 Eleventh of the Railway Labor Act1 between *116the Southern Railway Company and a number of railway labor organizations including the two petitioners herein, employees of Southern are obligated, as a condition of employment, to pay the periodic dues, initiation fees and assessments uniformly required as a condition of acquiring or retaining membership in the union representing their particular class or craft.2 The individual respondents herein are a number of- such employees belonging to classes or crafts represented by petitioners.3…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. International Ass'n of MacHinists v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Railway Employes' Department v. HansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Lathrop v. DonohueSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Hudson v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Ward Ex Rel. Ward v. Odell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by219 opinions

  1. Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Ellis v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station EmployesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Chicago Teachers Union, Local No. 1 v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Washington Legal Foundation v. Massachusetts Bar FoundationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  5. Eastex, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

214 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API