Harris v. Quinn
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alito
This case presents the question whether the First Amendment permits a State to compel personal care providers to subsidize speech on matters of public concern by a union that they do not wish to join or support. We hold that it does not, and we therefore reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals.
I
A
Millions of Americans, due to age, illness, or injury, are unable to live in their own homes without assistance and are unable to afford the expense of in-home care. In order to prevent these individuals from having to enter a nursing home or other facility, the federal Medicaid program funds…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Garcetti v. CeballosSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Kass v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Knight First Amendment Inst. at Columbia Univ. v. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Madison Teachers, Inc. v. Scott WalkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- Gil Ramirez Group, L.L.C. v. Houston Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- James M. Sweeney v. Michael R. PenceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.