Legal Opinion
Hernandez v. Afscme Cal.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided June 20, 2019No. 2:18-cv-2419 WBS EFBPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Nine employees of the State of California brought this putative class action against various affiliates of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees ("AFSCME") (collectively "the union defendants"), various officials of the State of California, the Public Transportation Services Corporation, and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Plaintiffs allege that these defendants have unconstitutionally compelled payments from plaintiffs to the union defendants and that they have not allowed public employees…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mark Janus v. American Federation of StateCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Allen v. Santa Clara County Correctional Peace Officers AssociationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Grossman v. Hawaii Government Employees Association/AFSCME Local 152District Court, D. Hawaii · 2020
- Kioussis v. Service Employees International Union Local 668District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Mark Janus v. American Federation of StateCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.