Legal Opinion

Ratner v. Hecht

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 31, 1985No. 84 C 10466PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BUA, District Judge.

Before the Court are defendants’ motions, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(2), to dismiss this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for lack of personal jurisdiction, or in the alternative, to transfer this case, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. For the reasons stated herein, defendants’ motions to dismiss are denied, and the motion to transfer is granted.

I. FACTS

This is an action for a declaratory judgment regarding the existence of a contract for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. P. S. & E. Inc., D/B/A Packing Seals & Engineering Co. v. Selastomer Detroit, Inc., a Division of Microdot, Inc., and Microdot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  3. Hotel Constructors, Inc. v. Seagrave Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
  4. Oakes v. Chicago Fire Brick Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Coats Co., Inc. v. Vulcan Equipment Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. US Ex Rel. Ondis v. City of Woonsocket, RIDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
  2. Brant Point Corp. v. PoetzschDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1987
  3. Quality Refrigerated Services, Inc. v. City of SpencerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
  4. Countryman Ex Rel. Upstate New York Pension & Retirement Fund v. Stein Roe & FarnhamDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
  5. Fink v. DeclassisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API