Legal Opinion

Fink v. Declassis

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 26, 1990No. 90 C 401PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BUA, District Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), defendants have moved to transfer this diversity case to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. For the reasons stated herein, defendants’ motion to transfer is denied.

I. FACTS

Defendant L.T. Laboratories, also known as L.T. Corporation (“LT”), is a Massachusetts corporation which markets and distributes health and beauty products. Plaintiff Peterson Corporation, formerly known as Brighton Products, Inc., 1 is an Illinois corporation which manufactures beauty aid products and markets them to retailers.

In…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ratner v. HechtDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  2. Trademasters International, Inc. v. BorerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
  3. Heller Financial, Inc. v. Shop-A-Lot, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
  4. Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc. v. Cellular Communications Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
  5. Schubert v. Gay & Taylor, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gueorguiev v. Max Rave, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
  2. Fink v. DeClassisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
  3. Moore v. Motor Coach Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
  4. Graham v. United Parcel ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
  5. Aldridge v. Forest River, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API