Legal Opinion

Quality Refrigerated Services, Inc. v. City of Spencer

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided November 2, 1995No. C 95-4061PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

BENNETT, District Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND.1476

II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND.1478

LEGAL ANALYSIS. Ill. 1479

A. Subject Matter Jurisdiction And Failure To State A Claim. .1479

B. Facial Or Factual Challenge Pursuant To Rule 12(b)(1). .1481

C. The Existence Of Diversity Between Quality Refrigerated and Defendants.. .1488

1. Tests Employed to Determine Corporation’s Principal Place of Busi-.1484

2. Quality Reftigerated’s Principal Place of Business .. .1485

Quality Refrigerated’s Taking Clause Claim. .1486

Motion to Amend. .1488

1.…

2Cases cited126 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803

121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Doe v. HartzDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1999
  2. Lawyer v. Hilton Head Public Service District No. 1Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  3. Gunderson v. ADM Investor Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2000
  4. Swanson v. Van OtterlooDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1998
  5. Jakoubek v. Fortis Benefits InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API