Quality Refrigerated Services, Inc. v. City of Spencer
District Court, N.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
BENNETT, District Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND.1476
II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND.1478
LEGAL ANALYSIS. Ill. 1479
A. Subject Matter Jurisdiction And Failure To State A Claim. .1479
B. Facial Or Factual Challenge Pursuant To Rule 12(b)(1). .1481
C. The Existence Of Diversity Between Quality Refrigerated and Defendants.. .1488
1. Tests Employed to Determine Corporation’s Principal Place of Busi-.1484
2. Quality Reftigerated’s Principal Place of Business .. .1485
Quality Refrigerated’s Taking Clause Claim. .1486
Motion to Amend. .1488
1.…
2Cases cited126 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Doe v. HartzDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1999
- Lawyer v. Hilton Head Public Service District No. 1Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Gunderson v. ADM Investor Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2000
- Swanson v. Van OtterlooDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1998
- Jakoubek v. Fortis Benefits InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.