Legal Opinion

Ponderosa Pines Ranch, Inc. v. Hevner

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 2002No. 01-831PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

¶1 Cherie L. Hevner appeals from an Order Granting Partial Summary Judgment and an Order Awarding Fees and Costs from the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County. We affirm and remand for a determination of attorney’s fees.

¶2 The following issues are dispositive of this appeal:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err in granting summary judgment to Ponderosa Pines Ranch, Inc.?

¶4 2. Did the District Court err in awarding fees and costs under Rule 11 and § 37-61-421, MCA?

¶5 3. Should this Court award Ponderosa Pines Ranch, Inc., attorney’s fees under Rule 32, M.R.App.P?

BACKGROUND

¶6 In the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bruner v. Yellowstone CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Wild River Adventures, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of School District No. 8Montana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Kuhlman v. RiveraMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Ruana v. GrigonisMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. DelaneyMontana Supreme Court · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Byrum v. AndrenMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Yorlum Properties, Ltd. v. Lincoln CountyMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Wills Cattle Co. v. ShawMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Ganoung v. StilesMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Runstrom v. AllenMontana Supreme Court · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API