Legal Opinion

Ganoung v. Stiles

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2017No. DA 16-0441PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shea

¶1 Defendants Bonnie Stiles (Bonnie) and Krista Berry (Berry), as co-guardians of Matthew E. Stiles (Matthew) and conservators for the Stiles Family Trust, appeal the June 9, 2016 Findings of Facts, Conclusions of Law and Judgment by the Twenty-First Judicial District Court, Ravalli County. We restate the issues as follows:

Issue One: Whether the District Court erred in determining the location, width, and scope of the Stiles’ express easement across the Ganoung and Mason property.

Issue Two: Whether the District Court erred by requiring the Stiles to pay the cost of fencing a new road on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blazer v. WallMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Guthrie v. HardyMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Craig v. SchellMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Strahan v. BushMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Nentwig v. United Industry, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Quarter Circle JP Ranch, LLC v. JerdeMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Masters Group v. Comerica BankMontana Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Thermal Design v. ThorsonMontana Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Collins v. WHAMontana Supreme Court · 2026
  5. Ganoung v. StilesMontana Supreme Court · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API