Legal Opinion
Runstrom v. Allen
Montana Supreme Court
Decided August 11, 2008No. DA 06-0464PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Gray
*316¶1 Edward D. Runstrom (Ed), acting as personal representative of the Estate of Richard Runstrom, and Edward (Ed) and Nancy Runstrom, individually, appeal from the order entered by the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, granting summary judgment to Jake Allen, M.D. (Dr. Allen) on the basis that the applicable statute of limitations had expired. We affirm.
¶2 The restated issues on appeal are:
¶3 1. Did the District Court err in concluding that minority tolling
under § 27-2-401(1), MCA, does not apply to the limitations period for the survival claim?
¶4 2. Did the District Court err in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ereth v. Cascade CountyMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- Blackburn v. Blue Mountain Women's ClinicMontana Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re the Marriage of McMichaelMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- Renville v. FredricksonMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- Wisher v. HiggsMontana Supreme Court · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wilson v. Brandt and Flathead ValleMontana Supreme Court · 2017
- Blackmore v. DunsterMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- Selensky-Foust v. MercerMontana Supreme Court · 2022
- Barbara Stine Trivett, Administratrix of the Estate of Jasper Trivett v. Summers County Commission d/b/a Summers County Office of Emergency Management and Carmen CalesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2023
- Devera v. Exxon Mobil CorporationDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.