Legal Opinion

Ruana v. Grigonis

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1996No. 95-421PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

The Grigonises appeal from the Ravalli County, Twenty-first Judicial District Court’s Order and Judgment granting Dennis Ruana, Robert W. Bielby, Carla J. Bielby, Pam McCoy and Karl HeinzFtaken, Respondents, summary judgment. The Respondents, Bielby and Ruana, are the developers of “Paradise Acres,” Pam McCoy and Karl Heinz-Finken are purchasers of one of the “Paradise Acres” lots which abuts the Grigonis property. Together, the Respondents moved for summary judgment arguing that they have a reserved sixty-foot easement crossing the Grigonises’ property as a matter of law. They base their…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Motarie v. Northern Montana Joint Refuse Disposal DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Warnack v. Coneen Family TrustMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Graham v. MacKMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Halverson v. TurnerMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Wild River Adventures, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of School District No. 8Montana Supreme Court · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Blazer v. WallMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Ray v. NanselMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Albert G. Hoyem Trust v. GaltMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Glacier Tennis Club at the Summit, LLC v. Treweek Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Kelly v. WallaceMontana Supreme Court · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API