Legal Opinion

Beail v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 6, 1951No. 1081PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

Appellant was charged and convicted of being a vagrant, to wit, “a person who wanders about the streets at late and unusual hours of the night without any visible and lawful business and not giving a good account of herself.” 1

The arresting officer testified to about twenty occasions between February 22 and March 13 when he saw appellant standing or loitering on the streets at night. Many of these occasions were as late as 1:00 and 2:00 o’clock in the morning. ' On some occasions she was standing in front of restaurants or lunchrooms. On some occasions she was alone; on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
  2. City of Portland v. GoodwinOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Clark v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. State v. GrenzWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Wagner v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hattie Mae Ricks v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  2. Thistlewood v. Trial MagistrateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  3. Beail v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  4. Harris v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Harris v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API