Harris v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Chief Judge.
Appellant was found guilty of vagrancy under Code 1961, 22-3302(8), which deems as a vagrant:
“(8) Any person who wanders about the streets at late or unusual hours of the night without any visible or lawful business and not giving a good account of himself.”
Appellant’s claim of error is essentially that the evidence did not support the finding of guilt, and consideration of this claim requires recitation at some length of the testimony of the two police officers. Appellant did not take the stand and offered no evidence on her behalf.
Officer Johns testified that on June 13 at…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- District of Columbia v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- Clark v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Beail v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Beail v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
- Hunt v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hattie Mae Ricks v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Golden Gate Corp. v. PoirierSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972