Legal Opinion

Beail v. District of Columbia

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 10, 1952No. 11147PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDGERTON, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from a conviction of vagrancy which the Municipal Court of Appeals affirmed. 82 A.2d 765. The information, dated March 13, 1951, alleged that appellant was on February 22, 1951 “and has been since that day and still is a vagrant, to wit; a person who wanders about the streets at late and unusual hours of the night without any visible and lawful business and not giving a good account of herself.” An Act of Congress provides: “The following classes of persons shall be deemed vagrants in the District of -Columbia: * * (8) Any person who wanders about the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Beail v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hattie Mae Ricks v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  2. Charles H. Kelley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
  3. John L. Worthy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  4. Allen Benton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  5. Harris v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API