Legal Opinion

State v. Curran

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1981No. CA 14335 SC 27038 SC 27046PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.

After defendant’s conviction following a jury trial and sentence upon a charge of unlawful possession of a controlled substance, cocaine, 1 the district attorney filed a motion for an order forfeiting 2 a certain motor vehicle allegedly belonging to defendant. The supporting affidavit alleged that the vehicle belonged to defendant, that defendant used the vehicle “in the unlawful possession and transportation” of the cocaine, and that such possession and transportation constituted a part of the criminal transaction which was the basis of the conviction.

The trial court held that defendant was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. United States Coin & CurrencySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. One Lot Emerald Cut Stones and One Ring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. State v. 1920 Studebaker Touring CarOregon Supreme Court · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. CarmickleOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Waybrant v. BernsteinOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. K. P.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Mims Amusement Co. v. South Carolina Law Enforcement DivisionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  5. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API