Legal Opinion

M. K. F. v. Miramontes

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 2012No. CC 0510408; CA A138024; SC S058847PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalters, J.

In this case, we decide that, in an action under ORS 30.866 in which a plaintiff seeks both a stalking protective order and a judgment for compensatory money damages, the parties are entitled to a jury trial on the claim for money damages.

Plaintiff 1 filed a petition under ORS 30.866, 2 alleging that defendant had engaged in knowing and repeated unwanted sexual contact with her in the two years preceding the filing of the petition and that that contact had caused plaintiff reasonable apprehension regarding her safety. Plaintiff claimed that she was entitled to three forms of relief: a…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Holien v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Horton v. Oregon Health & Science UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Hunters Ridge Condominium Ass'n v. Sherwood Crossing, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. Busch v. McInnis Waste Systems, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Evergreen West Business Center, LLC v. EmmertOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. N. R. L.Oregon Supreme Court · 2013

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API