Legal Opinion

Cornelison v. Seabold

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1969PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

. DENECKE, J.

The plaintiff workman was injured by the falling-. of a- water storage ¡tank which was being con structed. He brought this action against the defendants Seabold & Wolverton, a partnership, alleging they employed him in the construction of the tank, and against the corporation. Stevens & Thompson, Inc., alleging that they prepared the plans and specifications for the tank. The partnership and the corporation filed supplemental answers alleging that plaintiff’s sole remedy was that provided by the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The trial court so held and plaintiff appeals.

I

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. 1920 Studebaker Touring CarOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Mallatt v. LUIHNOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Moore Mill & Lumber Co. v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. In Re Idleman's CommitmentOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Plummer v. Donald M. Drake Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. GannOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Anderson v. GaileyIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Molodyh v. Truck Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Williams v. JoyceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  5. Bakker v. Baza'r, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API