Commonwealth v. duPont
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, J.:
¶ 1 John E. duPont appeals the trial court’s denial without a hearing of his Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) petition challenging, inter alia, the effectiveness of his trial and appellate counsel. We agree with the trial court that duPont’s PCRA contentions did not require a hearing. Consequently, we affirm.
¶ 2 This Court, and now the trial court in its thorough opinion denying duPont’s PCRA petition without a hearing pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 907, Trial Court Opinion, 9/22/03 (T.C.O.), at 2-10, have provided extensive accounts of the facts and circumstances surrounding duPont’s…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Commonwealth v. CarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. KimballSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. McGillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LopezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Joseph Wallace v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- Commonwealth v. VurimindiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. PerezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. AllenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.