Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Carr

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 22, 2001PublishedCited by 603 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Michael Carr, asks us to determine whether the trial court erred when it denied his PCRA petition as untimely without affording him a healing. We hold that Appellant’s PCRA petition is untimely as it was filed more than one year from the date Appellant’s conviction became final. We also hold that Appellant’s recent discovery of trial counsel’s failure to file a direct appeal on his behalf does not meet any exception to the PCRA’s timeliness requirements. Accordingly, we affirm the order denying PCRA relief.

¶2 The relevant facts and procedural history of this appeal…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. FahySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. Gamboa-TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. LarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. MurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by603 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Commonwealth v. HernandezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Commonwealth v. LawsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. MonacoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

598 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API