Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Allen

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 2012PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOpinion By Platt, J.

Appellant, Thomas Ray Allen, appeals nunc pro tunc from the order denying his first petition filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), 42 Pa. C.S.A. §§ 9541-9546. Specifically, Appellant argues that he was denied effective assistance of trial counsel per se for counsel’s failure to adhere to the technical requirements for admission pro hac vice and due to counsel’s suspension from the practice of law after he completed his representation of Appellant. We affirm.

The relevant facts follow: On May 2, 2007, trial counsel filed a notice of appear-anee and a motion for pro hac vice…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. OusleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Commonwealth v. ReavesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WaltersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Commonwealth v. FelicianoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. State v. VanderpoolNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Com. v. Allen, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Com. v. Bigio, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API