Legal Opinion
Louise C. Romero v. Smithkline Beecham, a Delaware Corporation Smithkline Beecham Pension Plan Vincent C. Bruett Stanley J. Serocca, Jr
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 30, 2002No. 01-3273PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALITO, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Louise Romero brought this action under ERISA sections 502(a)(1)(B), 502(c)(1), and 510, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1132(a)(1)(B), 1132(c)(1), and 1140, claiming that she was wrongfully denied ERISA benefits, was terminated for the purpose of interfering with her attainment of ERISA rights, and was entitled to a civil penalty because the administrator of her employer’s plan did not provide requested plan documents within the time specified by statute. The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants, holding that (1) defendant…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Maria H. Pinto v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Linda K. Moothart v. A. Gary Bell, Bradley P. Pollock, Bell & Pollock, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Mondry v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Melanie Stratton Jeffrey Stratton, Her Husband v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- McDonough v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Walter Dean v. National Production Workers UnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
- Hakim v. Accenture United States Pension PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.