Legal Opinion
Mondry v. American Family Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 5, 2009No. 07-1109PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROVNER, Circuit Judge.
When Sharon Mondry sought reimbursement from her workplace insurance plan for the speech therapy her son was receiving, she was advised that the therapy was not covered by the plan because it was “educational or training” and “not restorative.” For the next sixteen months, Mondry repeatedly asked both the plan and claims administrators to supply her with the plan documents containing the language on which the claims administrator had relied in denying her claim. When the relevant documents were finally produced, it became patently clear that the provisions of these…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Ponsetti v. GE Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Kenseth v. DEAN HEALTH PLAN, INC.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Gomez v. St. Vincent Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- In re WellPoint, Inc. Out-of-Network "UCR" Rates LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
- W.A. Griffin v. TeamcareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.