Legal Opinion
Linda K. Moothart v. A. Gary Bell, Bradley P. Pollock, Bell & Pollock, P.C.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 6, 1994No. 93-1161PublishedCited by 225 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATRICK F. KELLY, District Judge.
This appeal arises from' the efforts of plaintiff Linda Moothart to obtain information from her former employers, Gary Bell and Bradley Pollock, as individuals, and defendant Bell & Pollock,.P.C., regarding her rights under an employee benefit plan. Specifically, Ms. Moothart brought suit under 29 U.S.C. §§ 1024 and 1132(c), the disclosure provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), seeking copies of various plan documents and a penalty. The district court granted summary judgment in her favor on the merits, then held a trial to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Thomas v. Wichita Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Missouri v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Swanson v. BixlerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Luis E. Rodriguez-Abreu v. The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by225 opinions
- Mann v. BoatrightCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Farm Credit Bank of WichitaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Bryant v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. NicklCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Smith v. Ingersoll-Rand, Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
220 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.