Ramsey v. . Nebel
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
It is questionable whether the broadside nature of defendants’ exception to the “rulings of the court as appears in the judgment signed by the court, and the signing thereof,” even as somewhat expanded in the assignment of error, serves to bring before us, on this review, more than the form of the judgment to which objection is made. the exceptions do not point out any specific defect in the “rulings” or findings which might engage special attention of this Court — whether not supported by evidence, or in some particular beyond the power of the court, or otherwise legally objectionable. But…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boddie v. BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Carolina Central Railroad v. McCaskillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Thigpen v. Farmers Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Thompson v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- W. S. Mason v. . Alfred WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Newkirk v. PorterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Sparrow v. Dixie Leaf Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Wayne Finance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Phipps v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Caudell v. BlairSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.