Threadgill v. . Faust
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.
The questions presented by this appeal concern only the counterclaim set up by defendant Eaust. The referee concluded on the facts found by him that the plaintiffs were entitled to recover of the defendants $345.00 on the cause of action set out in the complaint, and his conclusion of law to this effect was adopted by the court below.
Upon the counterclaim of the answering defendant Eaust for damages on account of the fraudulent representations of the plaintiffs, whereby be was induced to enter into tbe contract of lease and caused to suffer loss in tbe purchase of machinery and in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- May v. . LoomisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Anderson v. . McRaeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Dent v. English Mica Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Wilson v. AllsbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Wilson v. . AllsbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- STANDARD AMUSEMENT COMPANY v. TarkingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Holder v. Home Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Morton v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Martin v. . McBrydeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Meadows v. . MeadowsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.