Keller v. Hennessee
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
This is an action in trespass to try title; therefore, plaintiffs must allege and prove both title in themselves and trespass by defendants. 7 Strong, N. C. Index 2d, Trespass To Try Title, § 1, p. 249. “Defendants’ denial of plaintiffs’ allegations of title and trespass places the burden on plaintiffs to establish each of these allegations. Day v. Godwin, 258 N.C. 465, 128 S.E. 2d 814.” Pruden v. Keemer, 1 N.C. App. 417, 161 S.E. 2d 783. Plaintiff must rely on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of defendant’s title. Norman v. Williams, 241 N.C. 732, 86 S.E.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Andrews v. BrutonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Moore v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Campbell v. MayberryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Brandenburg Land Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- COLE v. MONTGOMERYDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2023