Legal Opinion

Keller v. Hennessee

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 28, 1971No. 7130SC23PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

This is an action in trespass to try title; therefore, plaintiffs must allege and prove both title in themselves and trespass by defendants. 7 Strong, N. C. Index 2d, Trespass To Try Title, § 1, p. 249. “Defendants’ denial of plaintiffs’ allegations of title and trespass places the burden on plaintiffs to establish each of these allegations. Day v. Godwin, 258 N.C. 465, 128 S.E. 2d 814.” Pruden v. Keemer, 1 N.C. App. 417, 161 S.E. 2d 783. Plaintiff must rely on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of defendant’s title. Norman v. Williams, 241 N.C. 732, 86 S.E.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Andrews v. BrutonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Moore v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  5. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Campbell v. MayberryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Brandenburg Land Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  3. COLE v. MONTGOMERYDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API