Legal Opinion

People v. Tyus

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 1989No. 88CA1197PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

METZGER, Judge.

Appearing pro se, defendant, Gregory Tyus, appeals from the trial court order denying his Crim.P. 35(c) motion to set aside his conviction because his guilty plea was not voluntarily and knowingly made. We affirm.

Defendant pled guilty to theft. The trial court advised defendant that the presumptive range for his sentence was two to four years, but that he could be sentenced to as little as one year or as much as eight years under extraordinary circumstances. However, defendant was not advised that, pursuant to § 17-22.5-303(1), C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8A), he was also subject to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nardell U. Carter v. Daniel McCarthy Midge Carroll, John K. Van De KampCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. People v. McKnightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Craig v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  2. People v. ZunigaColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. People v. ColemanColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. People v. MontaineColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. People v. SandovalColorado Court of Appeals · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API