Legal Opinion

People v. Sandoval

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 1990No. 89CA0826, 89CA0893PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge HUME.

Defendant, Richard A. Sandoval, appeals the order of the trial court denying his Crim.P. 35(c) motion to set aside his conviction because his guilty plea was not volun tarily and knowingly made. We affirm the order insofar as it denied the motion to set aside the conviction, but vacate the sentence and remand with instructions.

Defendant pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery with a stipulated sentence of 16 years, the maximum for that offense. The trial court advised defendant that he could be sentenced to as little as two years, but that the court could not sentence him to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. White v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. United States of America Ex Rel. Arthur Decar Ferris v. Fred L. Finkbeiner and State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  3. People v. McKnightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  4. People v. TyusColorado Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Craig v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  2. Bullard v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  3. People v. BarthColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. People v. ColemanColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. People v. ReynoldsColorado Court of Appeals · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API