Legal Opinion
Buerkle v. United Parcel Service
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 18, 1953PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
26 N.J. Super. 404 (1953)
98 A.2d 327
HAROLD R. BUERKLE, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 8, 1953.
Decided June 18, 1953.
Before Judges FREUND, STANTON and FRANCIS.
Mr. Frank Fink argued the cause for petitioner-appellant (Messrs. Margolis & Margolis, attorneys).
Mr. Everitt Rhinehart argued the cause for respondent-respondent (Mr. John W. Taylor, attorney).
The opinion of the court was delivered by FRANCIS, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
Appellant was denied compensation by the Workmen's Compensation…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Geltman v. Reliable Linen & Supply Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
- McCrae v. Eastern AircraftSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
- Fenton v. Margate Bridge Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Van Note v. CombsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Levengood v. New York Shipbuilding Corp., New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau1946
3Cited by22 opinions
- Livingstone v. Abraham & Straus, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Crotty v. Driver Harris Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Konitch v. HartungNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Joy v. Florence Pipe Foundry Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Lewis v. Walter Scott & Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.