Legal Opinion

Konitch v. Hartung

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 3, 1963PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

81 N.J. Super. 376 (1963)

195 A.2d 649

JOSEPHINE KONITCH, AND NENAD KONITCH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

ALBERT E. HARTUNG, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 26, 1963.

Decided December 3, 1963.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, KILKENNY and COLLESTER.

Mr. David Shapiro argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. Robert J.C. McCoid argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Schneider, Lustbader & Morgan, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

Plaintiffs appeal from a Law Division summary judgment in defendant's favor. The court determined…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miller v. MuscarelleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  2. Eule v. Eule Motor SalesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  3. Stacy v. GreenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  4. Hagen v. KoernerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  5. Buerkle v. United Parcel ServiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Livingstone v. Abraham & Straus, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  2. APPLE v. ReichertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Wunschel v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. Blank v. ChawlaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  5. Wells v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API