Legal Opinion

Levengood v. New York Shipbuilding Corp.

New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau

Decided June 29, 1946PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

• The petitioner, Harry H. Levengood, seeks compensation from the respondent, Hew York Shipbuilding Corporation, alleging that on March 27th, 1945, he sustained an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with the respondent. The facts therein are not disputed. At the close of petitioner’s case, the respondent moved for a dismissal, contending that the petitioner had failed to establish that he sustained.an accident within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Act {N. J. 8. A. 34:15-1, ei seq.).

It appears that the petitioner was employed with the Hew York Shipbuilding…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bryant v. FissellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  2. Belyus v. Wilkinson, Gaddis & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  3. Gullo v. American Lead Pencil Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  4. Grady v. Nevins Church Press Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  5. Colucci v. Edison Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Buerkle v. United Parcel ServiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  2. Rice v. Pharmaceuticals, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API