Hackleman v. Lyman
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Action to recover damages for alleged fraudulent representations made by defendant to plaintiff, as a result of which the latter, in reliance thereon, was induced to purchase certain land.
Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff for $450 and costs, from which the defendant has appealed.
It appears that defendant was the owner of forty acres of unimproved land situated in Imperial Valley. The land was rough, and had never been ditched, leveled, bordered, or otherwise prepared for irrigation, without which it could not be cropped or cultivated. Negotiations were entered into between plaintiff…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Southern Development Co. v. SilvaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Farrar v. ChurchillSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Colton v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Wainscott v. Occidental Building & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Maxon-Nowlin Co. v. NorswingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wilcox v. SwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Shearer v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- De Garmo v. Petitfils ConfiserieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Greenberg v. HastieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. KlaffenbachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.