Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Klaffenbach
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.
In its general background this case is similar to Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Tatham (C. C. A.) 40 F.(2d) 894, this day decided, and other eases of the group therein referred to. It was commenced on August 15,1927, and the alleged fraud relied upon was committed prior to February, 1921. Plaintiffs (appellees) allege that on or about March 4, 1921, at Muscatine, Iowa, where they then resided, they entered into a contract to purchase from defendant ten aeres of the Rio Linda tract, near Sacramento, Cal., for $2,750, and that they were induced so to do by false…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Southern Development Co. v. SilvaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Slaughter's Administrator v. GersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Shappirio v. GoldbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Farrar v. ChurchillSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Farnsworth v. DuffnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Casey v. Phillips Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- McNabb v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Woodbury v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1964
- United States v. GoldbergDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- In Re BowenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.