Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Clough v. Compton-Delevan Irrigation District

California Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1938No. Sac. 5090PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an action by an unpaid bondholder of an irrigation district seeking partition of the lands of the said district which were deeded to the district after default in assessment.

The complaint alleges the following facts. Defendant Compton-Delevan Irrigation District was organized in 1920 under the California Irrigation District Act.. It issued over $300,000 worth of bonds to finance its works. Interest and principal obligations maturing on January 1, 1932, are unpaid. All of the lands in the district were sold to the district for delinquency, and in practically all cases the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Provident Land Corp. v. ZumwaltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. El Camino Irrigation District v. El Camino Land Corp.California Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Moody v. Provident Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. West Coast Life Ins. Co. v. Merced Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  2. May v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation District v. KlukkertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Irvine v. BossenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Allen v. HusseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API