Legal Opinion

State v. Lisbon Sales Book Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1964No. Nos. 38370, 38371, 38372, 38373 and 38374Published

1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.

The appellants’ assignments of error may be summarized as follows:(1) The Court of Appeals erred in holding that said indictments set out sufficient facts to constitute, or state, an offense under Section 2915.11, Revised Code, or, in other words, that the reversal by the Court of Appeals of the judgments of the Court of Common Pleas sustaining the demurrers, was prejudicial error.(2) Section 2915.11, Revised Code, as to these appellants, *484violates the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and also the due-course-of-law clause of Section 16,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. HuffmanOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State v. ChildersOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State v. YudickOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Troy Amusement Co. v. AttenweilerOhio Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. State Ex Rel. City of Columbus v. KettererOhio Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API