Legal Opinion

State v. Yudick

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1951No. 32354PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The single question considered and decided by the Court of Appeals was the sufficiency or insufficiency in law of the indictment returned by the grand jury.

Section 13437-4, General Code, provides as follows:

“In charging an offense, each count shall contain,, and shall be sufficient if it contains in substance, a statement that the accused has committed some public offense therein specified. Such statements may be made in ordinary and concise language without any technical averments or any allegations not essential to be proved. It may be in the words of the enactment describing the offense or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. WellsOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  2. State v. HuttonOhio Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. GingellOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. State v. ButlerOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. City of Toledo v. KohlhoferOhio Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. State v. KasnettOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. State v. BorchardOhio Court of Appeals · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API