Legal Opinion

State v. Huffman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1936No. 25469PublishedCited by 155 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.

There is but one question before us, namely, did the Court of Appeals err in reversing the Court of Common Pleas for error in its general charge to the jury on the question of intent?

We have no common-law crimes in Ohio, neither is there common-law criminal procedure in Ohio. We do, however, recur to the common law at times to get whatever light it may give on the construction of criminal statutes.

The common law distinction between offenses mala in se and mala prohibita helps us none in this case. If the statute defining an offense in Ohio provides that it must be committed with a particular…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. HennesseyNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  2. McNary v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Weitz v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by155 opinions

  1. State v. LottOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. GarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. CurryOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. PriceOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 1978

150 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API