Legal Opinion
Troy Amusement Co. v. Attenweiler
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 13, 1940PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGeiger, J.
This matter had its inception in the Court of Common Pleas of Miami county, Ohio.
Inasmuch as the matter was there decided on a demurrer by the defendants to the petition, it is necessary to set out the allegations of the petition with such minuteness as will enable us to determine whether the petition states a cause of action. Had the defendants answered and had the plaintiff thereupon demurred to the answer, we would have had a broader basis upon which to ground our opinion. Considering the general interest in the question, such a proceeding might have been advisable.
The petition recites…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Equitable Loan & Security Co. v. WaringSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Horner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Kraus v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- People v. ElliottMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Brooklyn Daily Eagle v. VoorhiesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fisher v. NeusserOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Cleveland v. ThorneOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Nadlin v. StarickMontgomery County Court of Common Pleas · 1963
- Pickaway County Skilled Gaming, L.L.C. v. CordrayOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Cook, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.