Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. City of Columbus v. Ketterer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1934No. 24523PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

The demurrer to the answer requires a determination of three principal questions. First, Does paragraph 7 of Section 1 of Amended Substitute Senate Bill No. 38, commonly called the Annat Law, and hereinafter referred to as such, create an effective exception to Section 2293-12, General Code of Ohio? Second, Is the Annat Law unconstitutional in permitting the taxing authorities of political subdivisions in Ohio to fix the maturity of the earliest installment of a proposed bond issue at five years after the earliest possible date of maturity? Third, Is Ordinance No.' 314-33, as amended by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Jordan v. Breece Manufacturing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Cochrel v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Fenwick v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. E. Liverpool v. Buckeye Water Dist.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. State ex rel. Ohio Funds Management Board v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State ex rel. Shkurti v. WithrowOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Kurtz v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Dayton Metropolitan Housing Authority v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API