Legal Opinion
Starks v. Albemarle County
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided August 9, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-0042-CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MICHAEL, District Judge.
Defendant Albemarle County brings its motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant Charles William Hurt brings his motion to dismiss plaintiffs claims against him pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons stated infra, the motions of both defendants are granted.
I. Background
The facts in this case are undisputed by the parties. The plaintiffs, George and Jacqueline Starks, brought this action in order to recover for damages suffered as a result of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. City of Blue Springs v. NixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- Ressel v. Scott CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Interstate Power Co. v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1991
- Richmond Metropolitan Authority v. McDevitt Street Bovis, Inc.Richmond County Circuit Court · 1997
- Jacobi v. BlockerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994