Legal Opinion
United States v. Caputo
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 16, 2005No. 1:03-cr-00126PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CASTILLO, District Judge.
Defendants Ross A. Caputo and Robert M. Riley (“Defendants”) have filed two motions in limine seeking to exclude certain evidence from trial. 1 First, Defendants have moved to exclude the testimony of patients and doctors regarding eye injuries allegedly caused by the Plazlyte sterilizer and to exclude patient records documenting those injuries. (R. 157-1.) Second, Defendants have moved to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Shayne Gad, a toxicologist who would testify regarding- — among other things — information about eye injuries and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Mark A. Smith v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Arzel Haley v. Boniface Gross, Lieutenant McKee and Michael EllisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Arturo Garcia Parra and Magdalena CorreaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. CaputoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- United States v. CaputoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006