Legal Opinion

Ex Parte American Fuel Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 18, 1923No. 6 Div. 814PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER GURIAM.

The question presented is, whether, under the facts found by the trial court, the Alabama Compensation Act (Gen. Acts 1919, pp. 206, 238) is applicable. The more specific inquiry is whether the occasion and circumstances of Grantham’s death were excluded from the act’s operation by the provisions of section 36, subdivision 2 (j) (Gen. Acts 1919, p. 238), reading:

■ “Without otherwise affecting either the meaning or interpretation of the abridged clause, injuries by an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment, it is hereby declared: Not to cover workmen except…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Greek v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. State ex rel. Duluth Brewing & Malting Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. Ex Parte Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Nesbitt v. Twin City Forge & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  5. State ex rel. Virginia & Rainy Lake Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Birmingham Post Co. v. SturgeonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Wooten v. RodenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Jett v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Prayther v. Deepwater Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API