Legal Opinion

Wooten v. Roden

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 18, 1954No. 7 Div. 100PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVINGSTON, Chief Justice.

This proceeding is for a declaratory judgment of the Circuit Court of DeKalb County, Alabama, sitting in equity. The principal question to be determined is whether or not an injury suffered by Oscar Ray Wooten is controlled by the Workmen’s Compensation Act of Alabama. Code 1940, Tit. 26, § 253 et seq. The final decree rendered in the court below was, in substance, to the effect that Wooten, one of the appellants herein, was injured in an accident “arising out of and in the course of” his employment The appeal is from that decree.

The evidence was taken as in chancery…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Madden's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. State ex rel. Duluth Brewing & Malting Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. Ex Parte Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Moore's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  5. Nesbitt v. Twin City Forge & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Trinity Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  2. Ricciardi v. Damar Products Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  3. Ex Parte Shelby Cty. Health Care AuthoritySupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  4. Pacific Indemnity Company v. Run-A-Ford CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  5. Slimfold Mfg. Co. v. MartinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API