Legal Opinion
City of Duncan v. Ray
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 6, 1933No. 23384PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.
This is an original proceeding to review an award of the State Indus-1 ri al Commission.
On January 29, 1932, the State Industrial Commission made its award, in which it found that the claimant, Carl Ray, on the 16th day of July, 1923, while in the employ of petitioner herein, city of Duncan, and while engaged in a hazardous occupation subject to and covered by the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law sustained an injury to his right foot, such injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. The Commission further found that claimant was temporarily totally disabled from…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wentz v. BrookshireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Hughes Motor Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Oklahoma City v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Mashburn v. City of GrandfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Spivey & McGill v. NixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Pemberton Bakery v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Hurley v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Consolidated Motor Freight Terminal v. VineyardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Payton v. City of AnadarkoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County v. BilbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.