Legal Opinion

Mashburn v. City of Grandfield

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 8, 1930No. 20661PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, O.

This is a proceeding by O. D-Mashburn to review a finding and order of the State Industrial Commission in denying him compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The essential fads are as follows:

The petitioner, 0. I>. Mashburn, was, and had been for many years, the town marshal of the village or town of Grandfield, in this state. “Town Marshal” was the title of his position, but coupled with the duties growing out of that particular office or position was the duty of night watchman for the town. had authority to arrest persons for infractions of the law, and his additional…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beaver City v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  2. La Belle v. Village of Grosse Pointe ShoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Earnest, Inc. v. LeGrandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Mobley v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. City of Duncan v. RaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Spivey & McGill v. NixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Payton v. City of AnadarkoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API