Legal Opinion
Consolidated Motor Freight Terminal v. Vineyard
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 2, 1943No. 29352PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.
This is an original action to review an award of the State Industrial Commission entered in favor of Ernest Clayton Vineyard and against Consolidated Motor Freight Terminal and Casualty Reciprocal Exchange, its insurance carrier, on June 27, 1939, for permanent partial disability under “other cases’’ paragraph, 85 O. S. 1941; § 22.
It appears that respondent Vineyard was injured in the course of his employment on Séptember 22, 1938, and there-1 after, on September 28, 1938, his em-' ployer, Consolidated Motor Freight Terminal, filed with the State Industrial Commission employer’s first notice…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Baldwin v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Union Indemnity Co. v. SalingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- United States v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- FARLEY v. CITY OF CLAREMORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- State ex rel. Turpen v. A 1977 Chevrolet Pickup Truck, VIN CC 1447S187406, Bearing Oklahoma License Number T 148-890Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- DEPT. OF SECURITIES EX REL. FAUGHT v. BlairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- Stewart Securities Corporation v. Guaranty Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- Read v. ReadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.