Legal Opinion
Pemberton Bakery v. State Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 15, 1937No. 27422PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
It is the view of this court that wholesale establishments are included in hazardous employments under the statute regarding Workmen’s Compensation (sections 13349-13350, O. S. 1931). The delivery of merchandise from wholesale establishments is an incidental part of the business so embraced within the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The work of a deliveryman is hazardous by force of statute. Therefore, irrespective of decisions relied upon (Choctaw Cotton Oil Co. v. Hall, 163 Okla. 288, 21 P. (2d) 1059; Padfield v. Atlas Supply Co., 167 Okla. 364, 29 P. (2d) 958; Clinton Cotton Oil Co. v.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wilson Co., Inc. v. MusgraveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- McQuiston v. Sun CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- City of Duncan v. RaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Beatrice Creamery Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Russell Flour & Feed Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- R. J. Allison, Inc. v. BolingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Thurston Chemical Company v. CasteelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Briscoe Construction Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Smith v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- H. J. Heinz Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.