Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Holmes

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 24, 1950No. Civ. 17698PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Alleging extreme cruelty by her husband, respondent prayed for divorce and for all the community property. Also, she alleged that she owns in her separate right a certain “chicken shack” which she had operated long prior to her marriage. In his answer and his cross-action appellant denies the cruelty and asserts ownership of an undivided half interest in the shack which he acquired by conveyance of respondent upon his payment of $500 one year prior to the marriage. In her answer to the cross-complaint respondent denied such claim of ownership and alleged that the conveyance of an interest in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cox v. SchnerrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Williams v. HasshagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance v. BirkelundCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Langley v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Hill v. BarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Patterson v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Anderson v. TorreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API